Growth decisions
Launch, price, or enter a market
Use these paths before a public-facing commercial decision creates customer, competitor, or category pressure.
Pick the kind of future you want to stress-test. Every path uses the same MiroFish engine: evidence in, graph memory, multi-round simulation, report out.
Stress-test launches, pricing, competitors, and market entry before the public story forms around the decision.
Choose by job
Each use case owns one search intent. Start where the evidence is strongest, then follow the related paths when the decision creates adjacent risk.
Growth decisions
Use these paths before a public-facing commercial decision creates customer, competitor, or category pressure.
Evidence decisions
Use these paths when the source material is research, sales evidence, support notes, or competitor messaging.
Public pressure
Use these paths when the risk is interpretation, trust, escalation, or a response that may be judged in public.
Narrative systems
Use these paths when motives, memory, pressure, and competing interpretations shape the next event.
Featured use cases
The top navigation should stay short. This page carries the growing library as new focused pages are added.
Stress-test launches, pricing, competitors, and market entry before the public story forms around the decision.
Model how multiple actors react, influence each other, and create second-order paths around the same scenario.
Model actors, incentives, rules, and constraints to inspect how local behavior becomes a system outcome.
Turn a brief, event, or decision into an inspectable simulated path with actor reaction and second-order risk.
Use MiroFish as a scenario engine to turn evidence, actors, constraints, and uncertainty into reviewable paths.
Explore plausible future paths from evidence, actors, constraints, incentives, and multi-round reactions.
Turn prediction questions, evidence, actors, signals, and uncertainty into reviewable forecast paths.
Research Polymarket market narratives, event scenarios, resolution criteria, uncertainty, and evidence gaps.
Inject YES catalysts, compare baseline vs bull shock paths, and inspect prediction market sensitivity and evidence gaps.
Use language-model actors with roles, memory, and context to inspect how group reaction may evolve.
Turn strategic plans, market memos, evidence, and constraints into inspectable future paths before committing.
Turn evidence, actors, and uncertainty into inspectable forecast paths before decisions harden.
Review revenue, cash flow, runway, budget scenarios, cost pressure, and FP&A assumptions before decisions harden.
Simulate earnings reactions, investor narratives, macro pressure, sector scenarios, and stock market risk signals.
Analyze investor mood, news sentiment, social market signals, bullish and bearish narratives, and evidence gaps.
Model how institutions, media, affected groups, and observers may reshape an incident, policy, or announcement.
Analyze reviews, comments, survey text, support notes, and social signals for sentiment drivers and themes.
Simulate buyer reaction, pricing pressure, channel friction, competitor response, and GTM proof gaps before rollout.
Turn ICP, positioning, pricing, sales motion, channel, and proof assumptions into testable GTM questions.
Simulate audience sequence, channel timing, positioning, pricing pressure, and competitor response before rollout.
Analyze launch briefs, customer notes, competitor research, pricing context, and beta feedback before release.
Inspect market signals, customer evidence, competitor context, positioning assumptions, and proof gaps before launch.
Validate launch claims, segments, pricing assumptions, buyer objections, and GTM proof gaps before release day.
Test buyer understanding, competitor framing, pricing objections, and the first story the market may tell.
Rehearse buyer, user, competitor, and public response before launch day turns messaging into market fact.
Rehearse customer objections, package migration risk, churn narratives, and competitor counter-positioning.
Analyze buyer price objections, discount pressure, procurement friction, competitor anchors, and proof gaps.
Simulate package design, discount policy, sales friction, competitor response, and pricing rollout tradeoffs.
Inspect willingness-to-pay evidence, competitor anchors, packaging assumptions, and pricing research gaps.
Analyze segment sensitivity, price thresholds, discount pressure, competitor anchors, and value proof gaps.
Test buyer urgency, incumbent response, partner constraints, and category framing before entering a new market.
Stress-test incident response, public narratives, media reaction, evidence gaps, and escalation pressure.
Inspect stakeholder trust, media narratives, public backlash, evidence gaps, and reputation repair paths.
Rehearse statements, media questions, stakeholder backlash, spokesperson language, and timing risk.
Simulate competitor responses, buyer objections, sales pressure, and positioning risks before the market compares you.
Simulate how competitors may answer a launch, pricing change, positioning move, or market entry.
Turn interviews, support notes, reviews, and product ideas into segment reactions and validation questions.
Simulate B2B buyer objections, pricing pressure, proof gaps, switching risk, and competitor alternatives before rollout.
Test stakeholder reaction, public interpretation, fairness narratives, and rollout gaps before a policy goes live.
Compare policy options, stakeholder effects, evidence gaps, implementation risks, and decision tradeoffs.
Assess affected groups, equity risks, implementation gaps, compliance pressure, and evidence needs before rollout.
Build an evidence-led 2026 match forecast from team context, tournament pressure, and competing narratives.
Treat a fictional world as a graph of motives, memory, and tension, then test how one new event changes the path.
Same engine, different futures
The page changes the question. The product still runs through evidence, graph construction, simulation, report, and follow-up interrogation.
Bring the brief, report, article, memo, or source material that defines the situation.
MiroFish extracts actors, incentives, constraints, and memory into a visible simulation structure.
Agents interact across multiple rounds so the second-order reaction is part of the forecast.
Review the report, inspect the assumptions, and ask follow-up questions about the simulated world.
Have a source already?
Upload the material you already have and choose the scenario you want MiroFish to stress-test.
Start from the console