Prediction market context
Market title, YES and NO outcome definitions, resolution criteria, current odds or price context, close date, and the specific uncertainty you want the bull shock to test.
Use bull shock simulation to inject a YES catalyst into a prediction market scenario, compare baseline vs bull shock paths, and inspect which evidence could move market interpretation.
Built for scenario planning, not certainty. Every output should be reviewed against real evidence before an operating decision.
Scenario tape / illustrative
Bull shock simulation for a prediction market question
Shock direction
YES catalyst
Market pressure
Odds sensitivity
Review target
Fragile assumption
Input
Market question, odds context, sources
Engine
Baseline, bull, and bear scenario paths
Output
Catalyst impact and evidence gaps
What to bring
Bull shock simulation works best when the source includes the prediction market question, resolution criteria, current odds or price context, evidence sources, bull case arguments, bear objections, likely YES catalysts, and the time horizon you want to inspect.
Market title, YES and NO outcome definitions, resolution criteria, current odds or price context, close date, and the specific uncertainty you want the bull shock to test.
News signals, public statements, polling, filings, data releases, legal decisions, product events, policy changes, or other evidence that could strengthen the YES side.
Bear arguments, unresolved facts, timing risks, resolution ambiguity, crowd assumptions, information gaps, and reasons the bull shock may fail to move interpretation.
Where bull shocks matter
A bull shock is not just optimism. It is a specific event or evidence update that could make the YES outcome more plausible under the market's resolution criteria.
Inject a positive event, announcement, data point, or legal signal and inspect how participant narratives may shift toward the YES outcome.
Compare baseline, bull shock, and bear-response paths to see where the scenario depends on timing, source quality, or resolution wording.
Turn the simulated bull case into concrete source checks, resolution questions, narrative gaps, and next scenarios to inspect.
MiroFish maps the prediction market question, resolution criteria, participant narratives, YES catalysts, bear objections, timing constraints, and evidence gaps, then runs baseline vs bull shock scenario rounds for review.
Stage 1
Upload source material and define the decision, event, or message you want to test.
Stage 2
Map the people, groups, incentives, constraints, and memory that shape the reaction.
Stage 3
Let the simulated actors respond over multiple rounds so the second-order path appears.
Stage 4
Review the trajectory, risks, weak assumptions, and what evidence would change the conclusion.
What the report should answer
Boundary conditions
Why MiroFish
Generic AI can write a bullish case. MiroFish helps inspect how a specific YES catalyst interacts with evidence, market narratives, resolution criteria, and bear objections.
Shock setup
Generic AI
Broad bullish argument
MiroFish
Specific YES catalyst tied to market criteria and timing
Scenario view
Generic AI
One confident YES take
MiroFish
Baseline, bull shock, and bear-response paths
Review output
Generic AI
Opinion with weak audit trail
MiroFish
Evidence gaps, fragile assumptions, and next source checks
FAQ
Use this page to inspect whether a positive catalyst could change a prediction market view before treating the bull case as obvious.
Bull shock simulation injects a positive catalyst into a prediction market scenario to test how the YES outcome case may change relative to the baseline and counter-case.
Polymarket market research reviews the whole market question, evidence, narratives, and resolution criteria. Bull shock simulation is narrower: it tests one YES-side catalyst and compares the resulting path with baseline and bear responses.
Upload the market question, YES and NO outcome definitions, resolution criteria, current odds or price context, sources, bull arguments, bear objections, event timeline, and the catalyst you want to test.
No. MiroFish does not provide trading, betting, legal, financial, or investment advice. It helps inspect assumptions, event paths, evidence gaps, and follow-up research questions.
Often yes. A bull shock is more useful when compared with a baseline and a credible bear-response path, especially when resolution criteria or timing can change interpretation.
Related simulation paths
Most decisions do not stay inside one category. These adjacent use cases help teams test the next market, customer, or public reaction path.
Prediction markets
Use MiroFish to inspect Polymarket market narratives, event paths, uncertainty drivers, and evidence gaps.
Open Polymarket Market ResearchPredictive paths
Use evidence, actors, constraints, and reaction rounds to inspect plausible future paths before a decision.
Open Predictive SimulationForecasting workflow
Turn evidence, actors, and uncertainty into inspectable forecast paths before decisions harden.
Open AI Forecasting ToolTest the YES catalyst
Bring the market question, resolution criteria, odds context, sources, and YES catalyst. MiroFish will turn them into a bull shock simulation with visible assumptions.
Start bull shock simulation