What is multi-agent system simulation?
It is a way to inspect how several actors or agents interact and produce a system-level path.
- Multiple actors
- Relationships and constraints
- Second-order reactions
MiroFish supports multi-agent system simulation for decisions where several actors influence one another. Teams can ground actors in a source packet, inspect the graph, run reaction rounds, read a prediction report, and ask follow-up questions. The goal is reviewable strategic rehearsal, not autonomous agent deployment or certainty.
Live decision rehearsal
Multi-role reaction path
Direct answers
Start with the evidence needed for the decision. Use simulation to expose uncertainty, not to hide it behind generated volume.
It is a way to inspect how several actors or agents interact and produce a system-level path.
MiroFish represents the system through a source-grounded actor graph, reaction rounds, reports, and follow-up questions.
Use it when a strategy, product, policy, or market decision depends on interaction among stakeholders.
Five-step workflow
Every step leaves something inspectable: the source, the actor assumptions, the reaction path, or the next human check.
Name the event, decision, audience, actors, and time horizon.
Use evidence to define goals, knowledge, constraints, and conflict points.
Use the graph to check who influences whom and where assumptions are weak.
Let actor reactions compound and create reviewable system paths.
Interrogate the report and convert claims into validation work.
Useful output makes the next decision or validation step more specific.
These boundaries apply even when the output looks detailed or consistent.
Frequently asked questions
MiroFish can support qualitative agent-based decision rehearsal, but it is not a programmable ABM framework for calibrated mathematical simulation, code-based model building, or formal sensitivity analysis.
Upload a focused source packet: the decision, context, actor list, known constraints, evidence, assumptions, prior research, market notes, and the question the team needs to review.
The graph makes actors, relationships, conflicts, knowledge, and influence paths visible before the report becomes persuasive, so weak assumptions are easier to challenge.
No. AI agents can rehearse plausible reactions and expose assumptions, but real behavior requires validation through people, data, experiments, or accountable domain review.
Bring the current evidence, a bounded question, and the assumptions your team is willing to challenge.
Related methods and scenarios
Follow a practical workflow from source packet and actor setup to graph review, report reading, and follow-up questions.
Compare traditional ABM, multi-agent systems, LLM simulation, and where MiroFish fits.
Review MiroFish's social simulation workflow with language-model actors.