Incident timeline
Known facts, sequence of events, unresolved claims, impacted groups, and current response status.
Crisis response rehearsal
Crisis Simulation AI
Stress-test how customers, media, employees, regulators, and online audiences may react to an incident before the crisis response is tested in public.
Built for scenario planning, not certainty. Every output should be reviewed against real evidence before an operating decision.
Scenario tape / illustrative
Crisis simulation for a delayed incident response
R1
CustomersTrust question forms
R2
Media and creatorsAccountability frame spreads
R3
Company responseEvidence gap becomes decisive
Dominant risk
Accountability gap
Amplifier
Delayed clarity
Evidence gap
Timeline proof
Input
Incident, statement, timeline, public context
Engine
Crisis actor graph + escalation rounds
Output
Response gaps and escalation risks
What to bring
Bring the crisis material before the public pressure peaks.
Crisis simulation works best when the source includes what happened, who is affected, what is known, what is uncertain, and how the organization plans to respond.
Draft statement
Official language, apology or explanation, commitments, evidence, legal constraints, and omitted details.
Public context
Prior trust issues, media attention, customer complaints, stakeholder concerns, and likely external narratives.
Where it earns its keep
Find the response gap before the crisis expands.
A crisis response fails when the public question moves faster than the official answer. MiroFish helps teams rehearse that movement.
Statement review01
See what the statement does not answer.
Simulate which unresolved question can dominate reaction after the first public response.
Escalation risk02
Identify who can amplify the crisis.
Model how customers, employees, media, regulators, or creators may widen the story.
Evidence pressure03
Find the proof gap that weakens trust.
Surface missing facts, weak commitments, and claims that need stronger evidence before publication.
A crisis is a race between evidence and interpretation.
MiroFish turns the crisis into a graph of affected actors, trust memory, public claims, and response constraints, then simulates how pressure moves.
Stage 1
Ground the scenario
Upload source material and define the decision, event, or message you want to test.
Stage 2
Build the actor graph
Map the people, groups, incentives, constraints, and memory that shape the reaction.
Stage 3
Run reaction rounds
Let the simulated actors respond over multiple rounds so the second-order path appears.
Stage 4
Question the report
Review the trajectory, risks, weak assumptions, and what evidence would change the conclusion.
What the report should answer
The report should harden the response plan.
- Which public question becomes dominant first
- Which actor can amplify the crisis fastest
- Which statement line may be interpreted badly
- Which evidence gap should be closed before release
- Which follow-up response should be prepared
Boundary conditions
Not legal advice or crisis certainty.
- Not a substitute for legal, PR, or executive review
- Not guaranteed public reaction prediction
- Not live monitoring unless current public sources are provided
- Not useful when key facts are intentionally withheld
Why MiroFish
Crisis simulation needs pressure rounds, not a generic statement critique.
Generic AI can rewrite a statement. MiroFish shows how actors may react to the statement, what spreads, and where trust can break.
Response test
Generic AI
Rewrite suggestions
MiroFish
Reaction rounds to the actual crisis material
Escalation view
Generic AI
General risk advice
MiroFish
Amplifiers, unanswered questions, and trust gaps
Review loop
Generic AI
One-off critique
MiroFish
Inspectable report with follow-up interrogation
FAQ
Crisis simulation AI, before pressure peaks.
The value is not certainty. The value is finding weak response assumptions while there is still time to adjust.
What is crisis simulation AI?+
Crisis simulation AI explores how stakeholders may react to an incident and response plan. MiroFish grounds the simulation in your incident evidence, actor graph, and multi-round reaction paths.
Can it replace a crisis communications team?+
No. MiroFish is a rehearsal and review tool. It should support, not replace, legal, PR, executive, and operational judgment.
What should I upload?+
Upload the incident timeline, draft statement, known facts, affected groups, public articles, customer complaints, prior context, or response plan.
Is this the same as sentiment analysis?+
No. Sentiment analysis observes or classifies existing reaction. MiroFish rehearses plausible reaction paths from the evidence and assumptions you provide.
When should I use it?+
Use it before publishing a statement, announcing a remediation plan, responding to media, or making a decision that could escalate public pressure.
Related simulation paths
Follow the risk into the next decision.
Most decisions do not stay inside one category. These adjacent use cases help teams test the next market, customer, or public reaction path.
Reputation risk
Reputation Crisis Management
Inspect stakeholder trust, media narratives, public backlash, evidence gaps, and reputation repair paths.
Open Reputation Crisis ManagementCrisis PR
Crisis PR Simulation
Rehearse PR statements, media framing, stakeholder backlash, and response timing before public pressure rises.
Open Crisis PR SimulationPublic reaction
Public Opinion Simulation AI
Model how institutions, media, affected groups, and observers reshape public pressure.
Open Public Opinion Simulation AIPressure moves fast
Test the response before the crisis tests it.
Bring the incident timeline, statement draft, or response plan. MiroFish will turn it into a crisis reaction scenario you can inspect.
Start a crisis simulation